Rectal Prolapse: Abdominal Approach

ABSTRACT

Even though there are over 100 procedures described for rectal prolapse, the approach toward surgery can be divided into the abdominal or perineal route. The abdominal approach offers distinct advantages. These advantages include a lower recurrence rate, preservation of a compliant rectum, ability to treat constipation more precisely, avoidance of anal stretch, and the ability to perform a precise anastomosis if required with an adequate blood supply. Therefore, with modern advances in postoperative care, most patients should be offered the abdominal approach due to its distinct advantages over the perineal approach.

Rectal prolapse - Ripstein - resection-rectopexy - constipation

REFERENCES

• 1 Gordon P H. Rectal procidentia. In: Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S, eds. Principles and Practice of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum, and Anus St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing Inc 1992: 449-481
• 2 Moschcowitz A V. The pathogenesis, anatomy and cure of prolapse of the rectum.  Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1912;  15 7-21
• 3 Madoff R M, Mellgren A. One hundred years of rectal prolapse surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1999;  42 441-450
• 4 Karulf R E, Madoff R D, Goldberg A M. Rectal prolapse.  Curr Probl Surg . 2001;  38 771-832
• 5 Speakman C T, Madden M V, Nicholls R J, Kamm M A. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study.  Br J Surg . 1991;  78 1431-1433
• 6 Felt-Bersma R JF, Cuesta M A. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.  Gastroenterol Clin North Am . 2001;  30 199-222
• 7 Nelson R, Spitz J, Pearl R K, Abcarian H. What role does full rectal mobilization alone play in the treatment of rectal prolapse?.  Tech Coloproctol . 2001;  5 33-35
• 8 Ripstein C B. Procidentia: definitive corrective surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1972;  15 334-336
• 9 Gordon P H, Hoexter B. Complications of the Ripstein procedure.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1978;  21 277-280
• 10 Yoshioka K, Heyen F, Keighley M RB. Functional results after abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1989;  32 835-838
• 11 Muir E G. Post-anal perineorrhapy for rectal prolapse.  Proc R Soc Med . 1955;  48 33-44
• 12 Schlinkert R T, Beart R W, Wolff B G, Pemberton J H. Anterior resection for complete rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1985;  28 409-412
• 13 Frykman H M. Abdominal proctopexy and primary sigmoid resection for rectal procidentia.  Am J Surg . 1955;  90 780-789
• 14 Huber F T, Stein H, Siewert J R. Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection.  World J Surg . 1995;  19 138-143
• 15 Husa A, Sainio P, Smitten K. Abdominal rectopexy and sigmoid resection (Frykman-Goldberg) operation for rectal prolapse.  Acta Chir Scand . 1988;  154 221-224
• 16 Watts J D, Rothenberger D A, Buls J G, Goldberg S M, Nivatvongs S. The management of procidentia. 30 years' experience.  Dis Colon Rectum . 1985;  28 96-102
• 17 Benoist S, Taffinder N, Gould S, Chang A, Darzi A. Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy.  Am J Surg . 2001;  182 168-173
• 18 Madbouly K M, Senagore A J, Delaney C P, Duepree H J, Brady K M, Fazio V W. Clinically based management of rectal prolapse.  Surg Endosc . 2003;  17 99-103
• 19 Eu K W, Seow-Choen F. Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical treatment.  Br J Surg . 1997;  84 904-911
• 20 Azimuddin K H, Khubchandani I T, Rosen L, Stasik J J, Riether R D, Reed J F. Rectal prolapse: a search for the “best” operation.  Am Surg . 2001;  67 622-627